Preliminary outcomes from two experiments counsel one thing may very well be incorrect with the essential manner physicists suppose the universe works, a prospect that has the sphere of particle physics each baffled and thrilled.
Tiny particles referred to as muons aren’t fairly doing what is anticipated of them in two completely different long-running experiments in america and Europe. The confounding outcomes — if confirmed proper — reveal main issues with the rulebook physicists use to explain and perceive how the universe works on the subatomic degree.
“We predict we is likely to be swimming in a sea of background particles on a regular basis that simply haven’t been immediately found,” Fermilab experiment co-chief scientist Chris Polly mentioned in a press convention. “There is likely to be monsters we haven’t but imagined which might be rising from the vacuum interacting with our muons and this offers us a window into seeing them.”
The rulebook, referred to as the Commonplace Mannequin, was developed about 50 years in the past. Experiments carried out over many years affirmed over and once more that its descriptions of the particles and the forces that make up and govern the universe have been just about on the mark. Till now.
“New particles, new physics is likely to be simply past our analysis,” mentioned Wayne State College particle physicist Alexey Petrov. “It’s tantalizing.”
The US Power Division’s Fermilab introduced outcomes Wednesday of 8.2 billion races alongside a observe outdoors Chicago that whereas ho-hum to most individuals have physicists astir: The muons’ magnetic fields aren’t what the Commonplace Mannequin says they need to be. This follows new outcomes printed final month from the European Heart for Nuclear Analysis’s Massive Hadron Collider that discovered a stunning proportion of particles within the aftermath of high-speed collisions.
If confirmed, the U.S. outcomes could be the largest discovering within the weird world of subatomic particles in practically 10 years, because the discovery of the Higgs boson, usually referred to as the “God particle,” mentioned Aida El-Khadra of the College of Illinois, who works on theoretical physics for the Fermilab experiment.
The purpose of the experiments, explains Johns Hopkins College theoretical physicist David Kaplan, is to tug aside particles and discover out if there’s “one thing humorous occurring” with each the particles and the seemingly empty area between them.
“The secrets and techniques don’t simply stay in matter. They stay in one thing that appears to fill in all of area and time. These are quantum fields,” Kaplan mentioned. “We’re placing vitality into the vacuum and seeing what comes out.”
Each units of outcomes contain the unusual, fleeting particle referred to as the muon. The muon is the heavier cousin to the electron that orbits an atom’s middle. However the muon isn’t a part of the atom, it’s unstable and usually exists for less than two microseconds. After it was found in cosmic rays in 1936 it so confounded scientists {that a} well-known physicist requested “Who ordered that?”
“Because the very starting it was making physicists scratch their heads,” mentioned Graziano Venanzoni, an experimental physicist at an Italian nationwide lab, who is likely one of the prime scientists on the U.S. Fermilab experiment, referred to as Muon g-2.
The experiment sends muons round a magnetized observe that retains the particles in existence lengthy sufficient for researchers to get a more in-depth have a look at them. Preliminary outcomes counsel that the magnetic “spin” of the muons is 0.1% off what the Commonplace Mannequin predicts. That will not sound like a lot, however to particle physicists it’s large — greater than sufficient to upend present understanding.
Researchers want one other 12 months or two to complete analyzing the outcomes of the entire laps across the 50-foot (14-meter) observe. If the outcomes do not change, it can depend as a significant discovery, Venanzoni mentioned.
Individually, on the world’s largest atom smasher at CERN, physicists have been crashing protons towards one another there to see what occurs after. One of many particle colliders’ a number of separate experiments measures what occurs when particles referred to as magnificence or backside quarks collide.
The Commonplace Mannequin predicts that these magnificence quark crashes ought to lead to equal numbers of electrons and muons. It’s type of like flipping a coin 1,000 instances and getting about equal numbers of heads and tails, mentioned Massive Hadron Collider magnificence experiment chief Chris Parkes.
However that’s not what occurred.
Researchers pored over the info from a number of years and some thousand crashes and located a 15% distinction, with considerably extra electrons than muons, mentioned experiment researcher Sheldon Stone of Syracuse College.
Neither experiment is being referred to as an official discovery but as a result of there may be nonetheless a tiny probability that the outcomes are statistical quirks. Working the experiments extra instances — deliberate in each instances — may, in a 12 months or two, attain the extremely stringent statistical necessities for physics to hail it as a discovery, researchers mentioned.
If the outcomes do maintain, they might upend “each different calculation made” on the planet of particle physics, Kaplan mentioned.
“This isn’t a fudge issue. That is one thing incorrect,” Kaplan mentioned. That one thing may very well be defined by a brand new particle or drive.
Or these outcomes could also be errors. In 2011, an odd discovering {that a} particle referred to as a neutrino appeared to be touring quicker than gentle threatened the mannequin, but it surely turned out to be the results of a free electrical connection drawback within the experiment.
“We checked all our cable connections and we’ve executed what we will to examine our knowledge,” Stone mentioned. “We’re form of assured, however you by no means know.”
———
AP Author Jamey Keaten in Geneva contributed to this report.
———
Comply with Seth Borenstein on Twitter at @borenbears.
———
The Related Press Well being and Science Division receives assist from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Division of Science Training. The AP is solely chargeable for all content material.
